Thirty years of Epistemic Specifications
Jorge Fandinno, Wolfgang Faber, Michael Gelfond

TL;DR
This paper reviews thirty years of development in epistemic specifications, discussing their semantics, applications, and future challenges in knowledge representation and reasoning.
Contribution
It provides a comprehensive overview of the evolution, semantics, and properties of epistemic specifications, clarifying the current state of the art and future research directions.
Findings
Multiple semantics proposals with varying properties
Analysis of the strengths and limitations of existing semantics
Identification of open challenges for future research
Abstract
The language of epistemic specifications and epistemic logic programs extends disjunctive logic programs under the stable model semantics with modal constructs called subjective literals. Using subjective literals, it is possible to check whether a regular literal is true in every or some stable models of the program, those models, in this context also called \emph{belief sets}, being collected in a set called world view. This allows for representing, within the language, whether some proposition should be understood accordingly to the open or the closed world assumption. Several attempts for capturing the intuitions underlying the language by means of a formal semantics were given, resulting in a multitude of proposals that makes it difficult to understand the current state of the art. In this paper, we provide an overview of the inception of the field and the knowledge representation…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
