Validating daily social media macroscopes of emotions
Max Pellert, Hannah Metzler, Michael Matzenberger, David Garcia

TL;DR
This study validates that social media sentiment analysis can reliably track daily macro-level emotional dynamics of online communities, aligning well with self-reported affective states and useful for real-world applications like monitoring COVID-19 impacts.
Contribution
It demonstrates that social media sentiment analysis accurately reflects macro-level emotional fluctuations and compares favorably with survey data across platforms like online newspapers and Twitter.
Findings
Strong correlation between sentiment analysis and self-reported emotions.
Combination of supervised and unsupervised methods yields best accuracy.
Social media data effectively tracks emotional responses to COVID-19.
Abstract
To study emotions at the macroscopic level, affective scientists have made extensive use of sentiment analysis on social media text. However, this approach can suffer from a series of methodological issues with respect to sampling biases and measurement error. To date, it has not been validated if social media sentiment can measure the day to day temporal dynamics of emotions aggregated at the macro level of a whole online community. We ran a large-scale survey at an online newspaper to gather daily self-reports of affective states from its users and compare these with aggregated results of sentiment analysis of user discussions on the same online platform. Additionally, we preregistered a replication of our study using Twitter text as a macroscope of emotions for the same community. For both platforms, we find strong correlations between text analysis results and levels of…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
