Bayesian Stokes inversion with Normalizing flows

TL;DR

This paper introduces a fast, flexible Bayesian inference method using normalizing flows for Stokes inversion, enabling rapid posterior estimation of solar and stellar atmospheric parameters, surpassing traditional computationally intensive techniques.

Contribution

The paper presents the novel application of normalizing flows for Bayesian Stokes inversion, offering a highly efficient alternative to MCMC and variational methods.

Findings

Normalizing flows accurately approximate posterior distributions.

The method significantly reduces computation time for Bayesian inference.

Applicable to complex non-LTE inversion models.

Abstract

Stokes inversion techniques are very powerful methods for obtaining information on the thermodynamic and magnetic properties of solar and stellar atmospheres. In recent years, very sophisticated inversion codes have been developed that are now routinely applied to spectro-polarimetric observations. Most of these inversion codes are designed for finding an optimum solution to the nonlinear inverse problem. However, to obtain the location of potentially multimodal cases (ambiguities), the degeneracies, and the uncertainties of each parameter inferred from the inversions, algorithms such as Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC), require to evaluate the likelihood of the model thousand of times and are computationally costly. Variational methods are a quick alternative to Monte Carlo methods by approximating the posterior distribution by a parametrized distribution. In this study, we introduce a highly flexible variational inference method to perform fast Bayesian inference, known as normalizing flows. Normalizing flows are a set of invertible, differentiable, and parametric transformations that convert a simple distribution into an approximation of any other complex distribution. If the transformations are conditioned on observations, the normalizing flows can be trained to return Bayesian posterior probability estimates for any observation. We illustrate the ability of the method using a simple Milne-Eddington model and a complex non-LTE inversion. However, the method is extremely general and other more complex forward models can be applied. The training procedure need only be performed once for a given prior parameter space and the resulting network can then generate samples describing the posterior distribution several orders of magnitude faster than existing techniques.