$I$-regularity, determinacy, and $\infty$-Borel sets of reals
Daisuke Ikegami

TL;DR
This paper demonstrates that under certain set-theoretic axioms, all sets of reals are regular with respect to any proper or strongly proper sigma-ideal, extending classical regularity results to broader contexts.
Contribution
It establishes the regularity of all sets of reals for any proper or strongly proper sigma-ideal under various axioms, including $ ext{ZF} + ext{DC} + ext{AD}_ ext{R}$ and $ ext{ZF} + ext{DC}_ ext{R}$, addressing open questions.
Findings
All sets of reals are $I$-regular under $ ext{ZF} + ext{DC} + ext{AD}_ ext{R}$ for proper $\sigma$-ideals.
The same regularity holds under $ ext{ZF} + ext{DC} + ext{AD}^+$ with additional conditions on Borel codes.
In models without $ ext{DC}$, strong properness ensures regularity assuming all sets are $ ext{infty}$-Borel and no $ ext{omega}_1$-sequence of reals exists.
Abstract
We show under that every set of reals is -regular for any -ideal on the Baire space such that is proper. This answers the question of Khomskii. We also show that the same conclusion holds under if we additionally assume that the set of Borel codes for -positive sets is . If we do not assume , the notion of properness becomes obscure as pointed out by Asper\'{o} and Karagila. Using the notion of strong properness similar to the one introduced by Bagaria and Bosch, we show under without using that every set of reals is -regular for any -ideal on the Baire space such that is strongly proper assuming every set of reals is -Borel and there…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsAdvanced Topology and Set Theory · Computability, Logic, AI Algorithms · Mathematical and Theoretical Analysis
