
TL;DR
This paper proposes a strategy to explicitly identify irrational numbers defined by multiple integrals, enhancing the work of previous methods that proved their irrationality but did not specify the numbers.
Contribution
It introduces a method to explicitly identify and evaluate conjectured irrational numbers from integral representations, complementing existing irrationality proofs.
Findings
Successfully identified several conjectured numbers
Demonstrated the effectiveness of the proposed strategy
Provided explicit evaluations for multiple integral-based numbers
Abstract
In their recent preprint arXiv:2101.08308, Robert Dougherty-Bliss, Christoph Koutschan and Doron Zeilberger come up with a powerful strategy to prove the irrationality, in a quantitative form, of some numbers that are given as multiple integrals or quotients of such. What is really missing there, for many examples given, is an explicit identification of those irrational numbers; the authors comment on this task, "The output file [...] contains many such conjectured evaluations, (very possibly many of them are equivalent via a hypergeometric transformation rule) and we challenge [...], the birthday boy, or anyone else, to prove them." Without an identification, the numbers are hardly appealing to human (number theorists). The goal of this note is to outline a strategy to do the job and illustrate it on several promising entries discussed in the preprint above.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsAdvanced Mathematical Identities · Analytic Number Theory Research · History and Theory of Mathematics
