On the evaluation of research software: the CDUR procedure

TL;DR

This paper introduces the CDUR procedure, a comprehensive four-step protocol for evaluating research software, aiming to improve research quality and support open science practices.

Contribution

It defines research software evaluation criteria and proposes the CDUR protocol, a structured method for assessing software quality and impact.

Findings

CDUR provides a systematic evaluation framework.

The protocol emphasizes citation, dissemination, usability, and research impact.

Recommendations support better research software practices.

Abstract

Background: Evaluation of the quality of research software is a challenging and relevant issue, still not sufficiently addressed by the scientific community. Methods: Our contribution begins by defining, precisely but widely enough, the notions of research software and of its authors followed by a study of the evaluation issues, as the basis for the proposition of a sound assessment protocol: the CDUR procedure. Results: CDUR comprises four steps introduced as follows: Citation, to deal with correct RS identification, Dissemination, to measure good dissemination practices, Use, devoted to the evaluation of usability aspects, and Research, to assess the impact of the scientific work. Conclusions: Some conclusions and recommendations are finally included. The evaluation of research is the keystone to boost the evolution of the Open Science policies and practices. It is as well our belief that research software evaluation is a fundamental step to induce better research software practices and, thus, a step towards more efficient science.