Derandomization of Cell Sampling
Alexander Golovnev, Tom Gur, and Igor Shinkar

TL;DR
This paper improves lower bounds on the space complexity of static data structures with non-adaptive query algorithms, refining classical results and providing tighter bounds for specific query complexities.
Contribution
It extends Siegel's classical cell sampling lower bound to non-adaptive data structures, offering improved bounds for all query times t ≥ 2 and specific results for t=2.
Findings
Lower bound s ≥ Ω̃(n·(m/n)^{1/(t-1)}) for non-adaptive data structures
For t=2, lower bound s > m - o(m), surpassing previous bounds
Enhanced understanding of space-query trade-offs in static data structures
Abstract
Since 1989, the best known lower bound on static data structures was Siegel's classical cell sampling lower bound. Siegel showed an explicit problem with inputs and possible queries such that every data structure that answers queries by probing memory cells requires space . In this work, we improve this bound for non-adaptive data structures to for all . For , we give a lower bound of , improving on the bound recently proved by Viola over and Siegel's bound over other finite fields.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsCell Image Analysis Techniques
