37 New Validated Planets in Overlapping K2 Campaigns
J. P. de Leon, J. Livingston, M. Endl, W. D. Cochran, T. Hirano, R. A., Garcia, S. Mathur, K. W. F. Lam, J. Korth, A. A. Trani, F. Dai, E. Diez, Alonso, A. Castro-Gonzalez, M. Fridlund, A. Fukui, D. Gandolfi, P. Kabath, M., Kuzuhara, R. Luque, A.B. Savel, H. Gill, C. Dressing

TL;DR
This study validated 37 new exoplanets from the K2 mission by combining follow-up observations and data analysis, revealing diverse planetary systems and demonstrating the potential of reanalyzing existing data with minimal additional effort.
Contribution
It introduces a method to validate multiple planets in overlapping K2 campaigns using follow-up observations and statistical analysis, uncovering new planets and system architectures.
Findings
Validated 37 new planets with false positive probability <1%
Discovered a sub-Neptune with the longest period detected by K2
Identified multiple multi-planet systems with diverse architectures
Abstract
We analysed 68 candidate planetary systems first identified during Campaigns 5 and 6 (C5 and C6) of the NASA \textit{K2} mission. We set out to validate these systems by using a suite of follow-up observations, including adaptive optics, speckle imaging, and reconnaissance spectroscopy. The overlap between C5 with C16 and C18, and C6 with C17, yields lightcurves with long baselines that allow us to measure the transit ephemeris very precisely, revisit single transit candidates identified in earlier campaigns, and search for additional transiting planets with longer periods not detectable in previous works. Using \texttt{vespa}, we compute false positive probabilities of less than 1\% for 37 candidates orbiting 29 unique host stars and hence statistically validate them as planets. These planets have a typical size of and orbital periods between 1.99 and 52.71 days. We…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
