Habitability Models for Astrobiology
Abel M\'endez, Edgard E. Rivera-Valent\'in, Dirk Schulze-Makuch,, Justin Filiberto, Ramses M. Ram\'irez, Tana Wood, Alfonso D\'avila, Chris, McKay, Kevin N. Ortiz Ceballos, Marcos Jusino-Maldonado, Nicole J., Torres-Santiago, Guillermo Nery, Ren\'e Heller, Paul K. Byrne

TL;DR
This paper reviews and compares habitability models from ecology and astrobiology, proposing integration to improve the assessment of habitable environments and guide future research and exploration.
Contribution
It introduces a framework for integrating ecological and astrobiological habitability models to establish new standards for evaluating planetary habitability.
Findings
Comparison of ecological and astrobiological models
Proposal for integrated habitability standards
Potential to improve target selection for exploration
Abstract
Habitability has been generally defined as the capability of an environment to support life. Ecologists have been using Habitat Suitability Models (HSMs) for more than four decades to study the habitability of Earth from local to global scales. Astrobiologists have been proposing different habitability models for some time, with little integration and consistency among them, being different in function to those used by ecologists. Habitability models are not only used to determine if environments are habitable or not, but they also are used to characterize what key factors are responsible for the gradual transition from low to high habitability states. Here we review and compare some of the different models used by ecologists and astrobiologists and suggest how they could be integrated into new habitability standards. Such standards will help to improve the comparison and…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
