Interface shapes in microfluidic porous media: conditions allowing steady, simultaneous two-phase flow

TL;DR

This study investigates the conditions under which stable, simultaneous two-phase flow occurs in microfluidic porous media, focusing on interface stability, bridging phenomena, and the influence of pore geometry and capillary pressure.

Contribution

It introduces a detailed analysis of interface stability and bridging conditions in microfluidic pore networks, expanding understanding of two-phase flow without pore occupancy fluctuations.

Findings

Stable bridging occurs within specific capillary pressure ranges.

Narrower cylinders increase the stable bridging range.

Snap-off and bridging depend on pore geometry and capillary pressure.

Abstract

Microfluidic devices offer unique opportunities to directly observe multiphase flow in porous media. However, as a direct representation of flow in geological pore networks, conventional microfluidics face several challenges. One is that simultaneous two-phase flow is not possible in a 2D network without fluctuation occupancy of pores. Nonetheless, such flow is possible in a microfluidic network if wetting phase can form a bridge across the gap between solid surfaces at a pore constriction while non-wetting phase flows through the constriction. We call this phenomenon "bridging". Here we consider the conditions under which this is possible as a function of capillary pressure and geometry of the constriction. Using the Surface Evolver program, we determine conditions for stable interfaces in a constriction, the range of capillary pressures at which bridging can occur, and those where the wetting phase would invade and block the constriction to the flow of the non-wetting phase ("snap-off"). We assume that the channels have uniform depth, vertical walls, and flat bottom and top surfaces, and that one phase perfectly wets the solid surfaces. If the constriction is long and straight, snap-off occurs at the same capillary pressure as bridging. For long, curved channels, snap-off happens as liquid imbibes before bridging can occur. For constrictions between cylindrical pillars, however, there is a range of capillary pressures at which bridging is stable; the range is greater the narrower the diameter of the cylinders relative to the width of the constriction. For smaller-diameter pillars, snap-off as non-wetting phase invades a downstream pore body is not possible. We relate these results to the shape of pore networks commonly used in microfluidic studies of two-phase flow to consider whether two-phase flow is possible in these networks without fluctuating pore occupancy.