Dimers, networks, and cluster integrable systems
Anton Izosimov

TL;DR
This paper proves the equivalence of two classes of cluster integrable systems derived from dimers and perfect networks on a torus, using flat geometry and boundary measurement matrices.
Contribution
It establishes the equivalence between Goncharov-Kenyon and Gekhtman-Shapiro-Tabachnikov-Vainshtein cluster integrable systems through geometric and combinatorial methods.
Findings
Characteristic polynomial expressed via dimer partition function
Edges as Euclidean geodesics induce a fractional Kasteleyn orientation
Boundary measurements relate to the partition function
Abstract
We prove that the class of cluster integrable systems constructed by Goncharov and Kenyon out of the dimer model on a torus coincides with the one defined by Gekhtman, Shapiro, Tabachnikov, and Vainshtein using Postnikov's perfect networks. To that end we express the characteristic polynomial of a perfect network's boundary measurement matrix in terms of the dimer partition function of the associated bipartite graph. Our main tool is flat geometry. Namely, we show that if a perfect network is drawn on a flat torus in such a way that the edges of the network are Euclidian geodesics, then the angles between the edges endow the associated bipartite graph with a canonical fractional Kasteleyn orientation. That orientation is then used to relate the partition function to boundary measurements.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsGeometry and complex manifolds · Random Matrices and Applications · Stochastic processes and statistical mechanics
