Two-Year Optical Site Characterization for the Pacific Ocean Neutrino Experiment P-ONE in the Cascadia Basin
Nicolai Bailly, Jeannette Bedard, Michael B\"ohmer, Jeff Bosma, Dirk, Brussow, Jonathan Cheng, Ken Clark, Beckey Croteau, Matthias Danninger, Fabio, De Leo, Nathan Deis, Matthew Ens, Rowan Fox, Christian Fruck, Andreas, G\"artner, Roman Gernh\"auser, Dilraj Ghuman, Darren Grant

TL;DR
This study presents a two-year optical characterization of the Cascadia Basin site for the P-ONE neutrino telescope, demonstrating suitable water clarity and background conditions for future deployment.
Contribution
It provides the first long-term optical measurements in the Cascadia Basin, validating the site for neutrino telescope deployment and informing future large-scale experiments.
Findings
Optical attenuation length of about 28 meters at 450 nm
Comparable optical environment to other deep-water neutrino telescopes
Long-term data supports site suitability for P-ONE
Abstract
The STRings for Absorption length in Water (STRAW) are the first in a series of pathfinders for the Pacific Ocean Neutrino Experiment (P-ONE), a future large-scale neutrino telescope in the north-eastern Pacific Ocean. STRAW consists of two 150 m long mooring lines instrumented with optical emitters and detectors. The pathfinder is designed to measure the attenuation length of the water and perform a long-term assessment of the optical background at the future P-ONE site. After two years of continuous operation, measurements from STRAW show an optical attenuation length of about 28 metres at 450 nm. Additionally, the data allow a study of the ambient undersea background. The overall optical environment reported here is comparable to other deep-water neutrino telescopes and qualifies the site for the deployment of P-ONE.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
