Low mechanical loss TiO$_2$:GeO$_2$ coatings for reduced thermal noise in Gravitational Wave Interferometers
Gabriele Vajente, Le Yang, Aaron Davenport, Mariana Fazio, Alena, Ananyeva, Liyuan Zhang, Garilynn Billingsley, Kiran Prasai, Ashot Markosyan,, Riccardo Bassiri, Martin M. Fejer, Martin Chicoine, Francois Schiettekatte,, Carmen S. Menoni

TL;DR
This paper reports the development of TiO$_2$:GeO$_2$ dielectric coatings with low mechanical loss, significantly reducing thermal noise in gravitational wave detectors and aiding their upgrade plans.
Contribution
It introduces TiO$_2$:GeO$_2$ coatings with low mechanical loss, enabling nearly twofold reduction in Brownian thermal noise for gravitational wave interferometers.
Findings
Mixtures of TiO$_2$ and GeO$_2$ show low internal dissipation (~1e-4).
A 44% TiO$_2$ and 56% GeO$_2$ coating can meet thermal noise requirements.
Results support upgrades for Advanced LIGO and Virgo detectors.
Abstract
The sensitivity of current and planned gravitational wave interferometric detectors is limited, in the most critical frequency region around 100 Hz, by a combination of quantum noise and thermal noise. The latter is dominated by Brownian noise: thermal motion originating from the elastic energy dissipation in the dielectric coatings used in the interferometer mirrors. The energy dissipation is a material property characterized by the mechanical loss angle. We have identified mixtures of titanium dioxide (TiO) and germanium dioxide (GeO) that show internal dissipations at a level of 1 , low enough to provide almost a factor of two improvement on the level of Brownian noise with respect to the state-of-the-art materials. We show that by using a mixture of 44% TiO and 56% GeO in the high refractive index layers of the interferometer mirrors, it would be…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
