COVID-19 Vaccine and Social Media: Exploring Emotions and Discussions on Twitter
Amir Karami, Michael Zhu, Bailey Goldschmidt, Hannah R. Boyajieff,, Mahdi M. Najafabadi

TL;DR
This study analyzes Twitter data to understand public emotions and discussions about COVID-19 vaccines, revealing trends, key topics, and differences in sentiment over time using computational methods.
Contribution
It introduces a combined computational and human coding approach to analyze large-scale Twitter data for public opinion on COVID-19 vaccines, highlighting sentiment trends and topic differences.
Findings
Negative sentiment decreased from Nov 2020 to Feb 2021
Twitter discussions covered topics from vaccination sites to elections
Significant differences in topics between negative and positive tweets
Abstract
The understanding of the public response to COVID-19 vaccines is the key success factor to control the COVID-19 pandemic. To understand the public response, there is a need to explore public opinion. Traditional surveys are expensive and time-consuming, address limited health topics, and obtain small-scale data. Twitter can provide a great opportunity to understand public opinion regarding COVID-19 vaccines. The current study proposes an approach using computational and human coding methods to collect and analyze a large number of tweets to provide a wider perspective on the COVID-19 vaccine. This study identifies the sentiment of tweets using a machine learning rule-based approach, discovers major topics, explores temporal trend and compares topics of negative and non-negative tweets using statistical tests, and discloses top topics of tweets having negative and non-negative sentiment.…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
