Improving the reliability of photometric redshift with machine learning
Oleksandra Razim (1), Stefano Cavuoti (1, 2), Massimo Brescia (2),, Giuseppe Riccio (2), Mara Salvato (3), Giuseppe Longo (1) ((1) Department of, Physics, University Federico II, Napoli, Italy, (2) INAF - Astronomical, Observatory of Capodimonte, Napoli, Italy

TL;DR
This paper enhances photometric redshift estimation accuracy using machine learning and self-organizing maps to identify and select reliable galaxy data, significantly improving catalog quality.
Contribution
It introduces a combined machine learning and unsupervised learning approach to improve the reliability and accuracy of photometric redshift estimates.
Findings
Photo-z predictions match SED fitting for spec-z<1.2
SOM detects unreliable spec-z causing biases
Cleaning procedures double the quality of photo-z catalogs
Abstract
In order to answer the open questions of modern cosmology and galaxy evolution theory, robust algorithms for calculating photometric redshifts (photo-z) for very large samples of galaxies are needed. Correct estimation of the various photo-z algorithms' performance requires attention to both the performance metrics and the data used for the estimation. In this work, we use the supervised machine learning algorithm MLPQNA to calculate photometric redshifts for the galaxies in the COSMOS2015 catalogue and the unsupervised Self-Organizing Maps (SOM) to determine the reliability of the resulting estimates. We find that for spec-z<1.2, photo-z predictions are on the same level of quality as SED fitting photo-z. We show that the SOM successfully detects unreliable spec-z that cause biases in the estimation of the photo-z algorithms' performance. Additionally, we use SOM to select the objects…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Code & Models
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
