Gas and dust from extremely metal-poor AGB stars
P. Ventura, F. Dell'Agli, D. Romano, S. Tosi, M. Limongi, A. Chieffi,, M. Castellani, M. Tailo, M. Lugaro, E. Marini, A. Yague Lopez

TL;DR
This study models the evolution, chemical yields, and dust production of extremely metal-poor AGB stars with metallicities down to [Fe/H]=-5, revealing their sensitivity to initial mass and processes like dredge-up and hot bottom burning.
Contribution
It provides new evolutionary models and dust yield calculations for extremely metal-poor AGB stars, extending understanding to the lowest metallicities and specific mass ranges.
Findings
Low-mass stars (<2Msun) produce significant carbonaceous dust.
High-mass stars (>5Msun) undergo hot bottom burning with minimal dust production.
Intermediate-mass stars efficiently produce nitrogen through dredge-up and hot bottom burning.
Abstract
We study the evolution of extremely metal-poor AGB stars, with metallicities down to [Fe/H]=-5, to understand the main evolutionary properties, the efficiency of the processes able to alter their surface chemical composition and to determine the gas and dust yields. We calculate two sets of evolutionary sequences of stars in the 1-7.5Msun mass range, evolved from the pre-main sequence to the end of the AGB phase. To explore the extremely metal-poor chemistries we adopted the metallicities Z=3x10^{-5} and Z=3x10^{-7} which correspond, respectively to [Fe/H]=-3 and [Fe/H]=-5. The results from stellar evolution modelling are used to calculate the yields of the individual chemical species. We also modelled dust formation in the wind, to determine the dust produced by these objects. The evolution of AGB stars in the extremely metal-poor domain explored here proves tremendously sensitive to…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
