Test of Significance for High-dimensional Thresholds with Application to Individualized Minimal Clinically Important Difference
Huijie Feng, Jingyi Duan, Yang Ning, Jiwei Zhao

TL;DR
This paper develops a novel high-dimensional hypothesis testing method for individualized clinical thresholds, addressing nonregular models and nonstandard distributions, with theoretical guarantees and practical applications in biomedical studies.
Contribution
It introduces a bias-corrected smoothed decorrelated score test for high-dimensional thresholds, handling nonregularity and providing asymptotic and bandwidth selection guarantees.
Findings
The proposed test controls type I error under null hypothesis.
Simulation studies demonstrate the method's effectiveness.
Application to clinical trial data shows practical utility.
Abstract
This work is motivated by learning the individualized minimal clinically important difference, a vital concept to assess clinical importance in various biomedical studies. We formulate the scientific question into a high-dimensional statistical problem where the parameter of interest lies in an individualized linear threshold. The goal is to develop a hypothesis testing procedure for the significance of a single element in this parameter as well as of a linear combination of this parameter. The difficulty dues to the high-dimensional nuisance in developing such a testing procedure, and also stems from the fact that this high-dimensional threshold model is nonregular and the limiting distribution of the corresponding estimator is nonstandard. To deal with these challenges, we construct a test statistic via a new bias-corrected smoothed decorrelated score approach, and establish its…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
