TL;DR
This paper introduces a novel approach to computational video editing by learning to identify plausible cuts from a large dataset of edited videos, outperforming baselines and demonstrating real-world effectiveness.
Contribution
It presents a new task for learning video cut plausibility using contrastive learning on a large dataset, with a benchmark and human evaluation showing improved performance.
Findings
Model outperforms baselines significantly
Human studies favor the proposed model
Effective in real-world unedited videos
Abstract
Video content creation keeps growing at an incredible pace; yet, creating engaging stories remains challenging and requires non-trivial video editing expertise. Many video editing components are astonishingly hard to automate primarily due to the lack of raw video materials. This paper focuses on a new task for computational video editing, namely the task of raking cut plausibility. Our key idea is to leverage content that has already been edited to learn fine-grained audiovisual patterns that trigger cuts. To do this, we first collected a data source of more than 10K videos, from which we extract more than 255K cuts. We devise a model that learns to discriminate between real and artificial cuts via contrastive learning. We set up a new task and a set of baselines to benchmark video cut generation. We observe that our proposed model outperforms the baselines by large margins. To…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Code & Models
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
