Probabilistic annotations for protocol models
Dusko Pavlovic

TL;DR
This paper introduces a probabilistic Hoare logic framework for reasoning about security properties in cryptosystems and puzzles, demonstrating its effectiveness through analysis of cryptographic protocols and trust-based puzzles.
Contribution
It presents a novel probabilistic logic approach for security reasoning, applied to cryptosystems and trust-based puzzles, with proofs of security and disproofs of vulnerabilities.
Findings
Verified security of Vernam and El-Gamal cryptosystems
Disproved certain security properties of these cryptosystems
Analyzed trust and noise in a modified Muddy Children puzzle
Abstract
We describe how a probabilistic Hoare logic with localities can be used for reasoning about security. As a proof-of-concept, we analyze Vernam and El-Gamal cryptosystems, prove the security properties that they do satisfy and disprove those that they do not. We also consider a version of the Muddy Children puzzle, where children's trust and noise are taken into account.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsAdvanced Authentication Protocols Security · User Authentication and Security Systems · Cryptographic Implementations and Security
