PoolRank: Max/Min Pooling-based Ranking Loss for Listwise Learning & Ranking Balance
Zhizhong Chen, Carsten Eickhoff

TL;DR
PoolRank introduces a pooling-based listwise learning framework inspired by physics, which improves ranking performance and calibration without requiring additional parameters or complex assumptions, outperforming traditional pairwise and listwise methods.
Contribution
PoolRank presents a novel pooling-based listwise ranking loss that enhances calibration and performance across neural retrieval models without extra model complexity.
Findings
Outperforms existing pairwise and listwise ranking schemes in retrieval tasks.
Automatically calibrates ranking balance for partially relevant documents.
Maintains efficient convergence rates in training.
Abstract
Numerous neural retrieval models have been proposed in recent years. These models learn to compute a ranking score between the given query and document. The majority of existing models are trained in pairwise fashion using human-judged labels directly without further calibration. The traditional pairwise schemes can be time-consuming and require pre-defined positive-negative document pairs for training, potentially leading to learning bias due to document distribution mismatch between training and test conditions. Some popular existing listwise schemes rely on the strong pre-defined probabilistic assumptions and stark difference between relevant and non-relevant documents for the given query, which may limit the model potential due to the low-quality or ambiguous relevance labels. To address these concerns, we turn to a physics-inspired ranking balance scheme and propose PoolRank, a…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsMachine Learning and Algorithms
