Unipotent Ideals and Harish-Chandra Bimodules

TL;DR

This paper introduces a geometric framework for unipotent representations of complex reductive groups, linking them to nilpotent orbits, primitive ideals, and Harish-Chandra bimodules, and generalizes previous notions of special unipotent representations.

Contribution

It provides a new geometric definition of unipotent representations, connecting them to equivariant covers of nilpotent orbits and primitive ideals, extending prior concepts by Barbasch-Vogan and Arthur.

Findings

Unipotent ideals are parameterized by finite group representations.

All unipotent representations are conjecturally unitary in classical types.

Special unipotent representations are shown to be unipotent.

Abstract

Let $G$ be a complex reductive algebraic group. In this paper, we give a geometric definition of a unipotent representation of $G$. Our definition generalizes the notion of a special unipotent representation, due to Barbasch-Vogan and Arthur. The representations we define arise from finite equivariant covers of nilpotent co-adjoint $G$-orbits. To each such cover $\tilde{\mathbb{O}}$, we attach a distinguished filtered algebra $\mathcal{A}_0$ equipped with a graded Poisson isomorphism $\mathrm{gr}(\mathcal{A}_0)\simeq \mathbb{C}[\tilde{\mathbb{O}}]$. The algebra $\mathcal{A}_0$ receives a distinguished homomorphism from the universal enveloping algebra $U(\mathfrak{g})$, and the kernel of this homomorphism is a completely prime primitive ideal in $U(\mathfrak{g})$ with associated variety $\overline{\mathbb{O}}$. A unipotent ideal is any ideal in $U(\mathfrak{g})$ which arises in this fashion. A unipotent representation is an irreducible Harish-Chandra bimodule which is annihilated (on both sides) by such an ideal. Our unipotent ideals and representations have all of the expected properties: the unipotent representations attached to $\tilde{\mathbb{O}}$ are parameterized by irreducible representations of a certain finite group (generalizing Lusztig's canonical quotient) and, when restricted to $K$, are of the form conjectured by Vogan. In classical types, all unipotent ideals are maximal, and all unipotent representations are unitary (we expect these properties to hold for arbitrary groups). Finally, all special unipotent representations are unipotent. To prove the last assertion, we introduce a refinement of Barbasch-Vogan-Lusztig-Spaltenstein duality, inspired by the symplectic duality of Braden, Licata, Proudfoot, and Webster.