Particle fluctuations and the failure of simple effective models for many-body localized phases
Maximilian Kiefer-Emmanouilidis, Razmik Unanyan, Michael Fleischhauer, and Jesko Sirker

TL;DR
This paper shows that simple effective models fail to capture particle fluctuations in the many-body localized phase, suggesting that more complex interactions are essential for understanding localization.
Contribution
It demonstrates that effective models ignoring assisted and pair hopping terms cannot explain observed particle fluctuations in the MBL phase.
Findings
Simple effective models are insufficient for MBL particle fluctuations.
Assisted and pair hopping terms are crucial in the microscopic Hamiltonian.
Existence of exponentially many conserved local charges in MBL is questionable.
Abstract
We investigate and compare the particle number fluctuations in the putative many-body localized (MBL) phase of a spinless fermion model with potential disorder and nearest-neighbor interactions with those in the non-interacting case (Anderson localization) and in effective models where only interaction terms diagonal in the Anderson basis are kept. We demonstrate that these types of simple effective models cannot account for the particle number fluctuations observed in the MBL phase of the microscopic model. This implies that assisted and pair hopping terms---generated when transforming the microscopic Hamiltonian into the Anderson basis---cannot be neglected. As a consequence, it appears questionable if the microscopic model possesses an exponential number of exactly conserved local charges. If such exactly conserved local charges do not exist, then particles are expected to ultimately…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
