Response to comment on "Spin-lattice coupling and the emergence of the trimerized phase in the $S=1$ kagome antiferromagnet Na$_2$Ti$_3$Cl$_8$", Phys. Rev. Lett. 124, 167203 (2020)
Arpita Paul, Chia-Min Chung, Turan Birol, Hitesh J. Changlani

TL;DR
This paper is a formal response addressing comments on previous research about spin-lattice coupling and trimerized phases in a specific $S=1$ kagome antiferromagnet, clarifying and defending earlier findings.
Contribution
It provides a detailed rebuttal to critiques of prior work on the magnetic properties of Na$_2$Ti$_3$Cl$_8$, reinforcing the original conclusions about its phase behavior.
Findings
Clarifies misunderstandings in the comment by Khomskii et al.
Reaffirms the original interpretation of the spin-lattice coupling effects.
Strengthens the evidence for the trimerized phase in the material.
Abstract
In the context of the kagome antiferromagnet NaTiCl, we respond to the comment by Khomskii et al. [D.I. Khomskii, T. Mizokawa and S.V. Streltsov, Phys. Rev. Lett. 127, 049701 (2021)] on previous work by Paul et al. [A. Paul, C.-M. Chung, T. Birol, and H. J. Changlani, Phys. Rev. Lett. 124, 167203 (2020)].
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
