Spatial polarization modulators: distinguishing diffraction effects from spatial polarization modulation
Willeke Mulder, David S. Doelman, Christoph U. Keller, C.H. Lucas, Patty, Frans Snik

TL;DR
This paper investigates how diffraction effects can cause spurious polarization signals in a spectropolarimeter designed for detecting biosignatures, and verifies these effects through simulations and laboratory measurements.
Contribution
It identifies and explains diffraction-induced artifacts in a novel polarization detection instrument, improving the understanding of spurious signals in space-based biosignature detection.
Findings
Fresnel diffraction can produce false polarization modulations.
Simulations match laboratory measurements of diffraction effects.
Design modifications can mitigate spurious polarization signals.
Abstract
Are we alone? In our quest to find life beyond Earth, we use our own planet to develop and verify new methods and techniques to remotely detect life. Our Life Signature Detection polarimeter (LSDpol), a snapshot full-Stokes spectropolarimeter to be deployed in the field and in space, looks for signals of life on Earth by sensing the linear and circular polarization states of reflected light. Examples of these biosignatures are linear polarization resulting from O2-A band and vegetation, e.g. the Red edge and the Green bump, as well as circular polarization resulting from the homochirality of biotic molecules. LSDpol is optimized for sensing circular polarization. To this end, LSDpol employs a spatial light modulator in the entrance slit of the spectrograph, a liquid-crystal quarter-wave retarder where the fast axis rotates as a function of slit position. The original design of LSDpol…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
