Measurement of the cross section for $e^{+}e^{-}\rightarrow\Lambda\bar\Lambda$ and evidence of the decay $\psi(3770)\rightarrow\Lambda\bar\Lambda$
BESIII Collaboration: M. Ablikim, M. N. Achasov, P. Adlarson, S., Ahmed, M. Albrecht, R. Aliberti, A. Amoroso, M. R. An, Q. An, X. H. Bai, Y., Bai, O. Bakina, R. Baldini Ferroli, I. Balossino, Y. Ban, K. Begzsuren, N., Berger, M. Bertani, D. Bettoni, F. Bianchi, J. Bloms

TL;DR
This study measures the cross section of the process e+e- to Lambda anti-Lambda across various energies and finds evidence for the decay of psi(3770) into Lambda anti-Lambda, highlighting the influence of vector charmonium states.
Contribution
First measurement of the e+e- to Lambda anti-Lambda cross section over a wide energy range with evidence for psi(3770) decay into Lambda anti-Lambda.
Findings
Evidence of psi(3770) decay with 4.6-4.9σ significance.
Lower bound on branching fraction is 2.4×10⁻⁶ at 90% C.L.
Set upper limits on products of electronic widths and branching fractions.
Abstract
The Born cross section of the process is measured at 33 center-of-mass energies between 3.51 and 4.60 GeV using data corresponding to the total integrated luminosity of 20.0 fb collected with the BESIII detector at the BEPCII collider. Describing the energy dependence of the cross section requires a contribution from the decay, which is fitted with a significance of 4.6-4.9 including the systematic uncertainty. The lower bound on its branching fraction is at the 90% confidence level (C.L.), at least an order of magnitude larger than expected from predictions using a scaling based on observed electronic widths. This result indicates the importance of effects from vector charmonium(-like) states when interpreting data in terms of e.g., electromagnetic structure…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
