Recovery and analysis of rest-frame UV emission lines in 2052 galaxies observed with MUSE at $1.5 < z < 6.4$
K. B. Schmidt, J. Kerutt, L. Wisotzki, T. Urrutia, A. Feltre, M. V., Maseda, T. Nanayakkara, R. Bacon, L. A. Boogaard, S. Conseil, T. Contini, E., C. Herenz, W. Kollatschny, M. Krumpe, F. Leclercq, G. Mahler, J. Matthee, V., Mauerhofer, J. Richard, J. Schaye

TL;DR
This study analyzes a large sample of 2052 galaxies at redshifts 1.5 to 6.4 using MUSE data, focusing on rest-frame UV emission lines to understand galaxy properties and their evolution in the early universe.
Contribution
It provides a comprehensive catalog of UV emission lines in high-redshift galaxies and explores their connection to galaxy physical parameters, including ionization and metallicity.
Findings
Detection efficiency of UV lines increases with survey depth.
UV line strength correlates with Ciii] emission.
UV emitters have ionization parameter log10(U) ≈ -2.5 and metallicity around 0.66 Z⊙.
Abstract
[Abbreviated] Rest-frame UV emission lines probe physical parameters of the emitting star-forming galaxies and their environments. The strongest main UV line, Ly, has been instrumental in advancing the general knowledge of galaxy formation in the early universe. However, observing Ly emission becomes increasingly challenging at when the neutral hydrogen fraction of the CGM and IGM increases. Secondary weaker UV emission lines provide important alternative methods for studying galaxy properties at high redshift. We present a large sample of rest-frame UV emission line sources at intermediate redshift for calibrating and exploring the connection between secondary UV lines and the emitting galaxies' physical properties and their Ly emission. The sample of 2052 emission line sources with was selected through untargeted source detection…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
