TL;DR
This paper investigates how varying levels of sparsity in a hierarchical vision model affect its ability to perform visual tasks, revealing that increased sparsity enhances texture sensitivity and inference capabilities, despite reduced classification accuracy.
Contribution
It introduces a sparse coding approach into a hierarchical V2 model, controlling sparsity levels to study their impact on visual task performance and biological plausibility.
Findings
Higher sparsity leads to more biologically realistic features.
Sparse coding improves texture sensitivity matching V2.
Increased sparsity enhances deleted-region inference.
Abstract
Sparse coding has been incorporated in models of the visual cortex for its computational advantages and connection to biology. But how the level of sparsity contributes to performance on visual tasks is not well understood. In this work, sparse coding has been integrated into an existing hierarchical V2 model (Hosoya and Hyv\"arinen, 2015), but replacing its independent component analysis (ICA) with an explicit sparse coding in which the degree of sparsity can be controlled. After training, the sparse coding basis functions with a higher degree of sparsity resembled qualitatively different structures, such as curves and corners. The contributions of the models were assessed with image classification tasks, specifically tasks associated with mid-level vision including figure-ground classification, texture classification, and angle prediction between two line stimuli. In addition, the…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Code & Models
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
MethodsIndependent Component Analysis
