Boulders on Mercury
Mikhail A. Kreslavsky, Anastasia Yu. Zharkova, James W. Head, Maria I., Gritsevich

TL;DR
This study maps and compares boulder populations on Mercury and the Moon, revealing Mercury's boulders are significantly less abundant, likely due to higher thermal stresses, thicker regolith, and increased micrometeoritic abrasion.
Contribution
It provides the first comprehensive quantitative analysis of boulder distribution on Mercury and compares it with lunar data, proposing causes for the observed differences.
Findings
Boulders on Mercury are ~30 times less abundant than on the Moon.
Boulder detection limit was approximately 5 meters in size.
Multiple factors, including thermal stress and micrometeoritic abrasion, likely explain the scarcity of Mercury's boulders.
Abstract
Boulders on the surfaces of planets, satellites and small bodies, as well as their geological associations, provide important information about surface processes. We analyzed all available images of the surface of Mercury that have sufficient resolution and quality to detect boulders, and we mapped all the boulders observed. The lower size limit of detectable boulders was ~5 m. All boulders found on Mercury are associated with fresh impact craters hundreds of meters in diameter or larger. We compared boulder population on Mercury with population of boulders of the same size on the Moon, and found that boulders on Mercury are ~30 times less abundant than in the lunar highlands. This exact quantitative estimate is inherently inaccurate due to the limitation in the source data; however, the significant relative rarity of boulders on Mercury can be firmly and reliably established. We…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
