Correcting Arabic Soft Spelling Mistakes using BiLSTM-based Machine Learning

TL;DR

This paper introduces a BiLSTM-based method for correcting soft spelling mistakes in Arabic, addressing typographical and orthographic errors at the character level, achieving high accuracy without complex architectures.

Contribution

Proposes a novel BiLSTM approach for Arabic soft spelling correction that handles omission and addition errors efficiently at the character level.

Findings

Achieves 96.4% correction rate on injected errors

Character error rate of 1.28% on real test data

Effective low-resource training technique for spelling correction

Abstract

Soft spelling errors are a class of spelling mistakes that is widespread among native Arabic speakers and foreign learners alike. Some of these errors are typographical in nature. They occur due to orthographic variations of some Arabic letters and the complex rules that dictate their correct usage. Many people forgo these rules, and given the identical phonetic sounds, they often confuse such letters. In this paper, we propose a bidirectional long short-term memory network that corrects this class of errors. We develop, train, evaluate, and compare a set of BiLSTM networks. We approach the spelling correction problem at the character level. We handle Arabic texts from both classical and modern standard Arabic. We treat the problem as a one-to-one sequence transcription problem. Since the soft Arabic errors class encompasses omission and addition mistakes, to preserve the one-to-one sequence transcription, we propose a simple low-resource yet effective technique that maintains the one-to-one sequencing and avoids using a costly encoder-decoder architecture. We train the BiLSTM models to correct the spelling mistakes using transformed input and stochastic error injection approaches. We recommend a configuration that has two BiLSTM layers, uses the dropout regularization, and is trained using the latter training approach with error injection rate of 40%. The best model corrects 96.4% of the injected errors and achieves a low character error rate of 1.28% on a real test set of soft spelling mistakes.