Two regimes of tidal-stream circularization by supermassive black holes

TL;DR

This paper identifies two distinct regimes of tidal-stream circularization around supermassive black holes, based on the timing of debris circularization relative to fallback rate peak, with implications for observed TDE light curves.

Contribution

It introduces a model distinguishing slow and fast circularization regimes and predicts their observational signatures in TDE light curves.

Findings

Two regimes of tidal-stream circularization identified

Predicted double-peaked light curves in the fast regime

Transition between regimes depends on black hole mass and penetration factor

Abstract

Stars that approach a supermassive black hole (SMBH) too closely can be disrupted by the tidal gravitational field of the SMBH. The resulting debris forms a tidal stream orbiting the SMBH which can collide with itself due to relativistic apsidal precession. These self-collisions dissipate energy, causing the stream to circularize. We perform kinematic simulations of these stream self-collisions to estimate the efficiency of this circularization as a function of SMBH mass $M_\bullet$ and penetration factor $\beta$, the ratio of the tidal radius to the pericenter distance. We uncover two distinct regimes depending on whether the time $t_c$ at which the most tightly bound debris circularizes is greater or less than the time $t_{\rm fb}$ at which the mass fallback rate peaks. The bolometric light curve of energy dissipated in the stream self-collisions has a single peak at $t > t_{\rm fb}$ in the slow circularization regime ($t_c > t_{\rm fb}$), but two peaks (one at $t < t_{\rm fb}$ and a second at $t_{\rm fb}$) in the fast circularization regime ($t_c < t_{\rm fb}$). Tidal streams will circularize in the slow (fast) regime for apsidal precession angles less (greater) than 0.2 radians which occur for $\beta \lesssim (\gtrsim) (M_\bullet/10^6M_\odot)^{-2/3}$. The observation of prominent double peaks in bolometric TDE light curves near the transition between these two regimes would strongly support our model of tidal-stream kinematics.