Can we bypass no-go theorem for Ricci-inverse Gravity?
Indranil Das (CEBS Mumbai), Joseph P Johnson, S. Shankaranarayanan, (IIT Bombay)

TL;DR
This paper investigates Ricci-inverse gravity models, demonstrating through numerical and theoretical analysis that these models cannot explain late-time cosmic acceleration, thus confirming the no-go theorem in this context.
Contribution
The study introduces two classes of Ricci-inverse gravity models and proves, both numerically and via reduced action, that they cannot account for late-time cosmic acceleration, reinforcing the no-go theorem.
Findings
Models fail to produce late-time acceleration.
Numerical solutions show no transition to accelerated expansion.
Reduced action analysis confirms the no-go theorem.
Abstract
Recently, Amendola et al. proposed a geometrical theory of gravity containing higher-order derivative terms. The authors introduced anticurvature scalar , which is the trace of the inverse of the Ricci tensor (). In this work, we consider two classes of Ricci-inverse -- Class I and Class II -- models. Class I models are of the form where is a function of Ricci and anticurvature scalars. Class II models are of the form where is a function of Ricci scalar and square of anticurvature tensor. For both these classes of models, we numerically solve the modified Friedmann equations in the redshift range . We show that the late-time evolution of the Universe, i.e., evolution from matter-dominated epoch to accelerated expansion epoch, \emph{can not} be explained by these two classes of…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsCosmology and Gravitation Theories · Geophysics and Gravity Measurements · Black Holes and Theoretical Physics
