Probing Strangeness Canonical Ensemble with $K^{-}$, $\phi(1020)$ and $\Xi^{-}$ Production in Au+Au Collisions at ${\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = \rm{3\,GeV}}$
STAR Collaboration: M. S. Abdallah, B. E. Aboona, J. Adam, L., Adamczyk, J. R. Adams, J. K. Adkins, G. Agakishiev, I. Aggarwal, M. M., Aggarwal, Z. Ahammed, I. Alekseev, D. M. Anderson, A. Aparin, E. C., Aschenauer, M. U. Ashraf, F. G. Atetalla, A. Attri, G. S. Averichev, V.

TL;DR
This study measures strange hadron production in Au+Au collisions at 3 GeV, revealing that canonical ensemble models better describe the data than grand canonical models, indicating different medium properties at high baryon density.
Contribution
First multi-differential measurements of strange hadrons at 3 GeV, comparing thermal and transport models, and highlighting the relevance of canonical ensemble in high baryon density conditions.
Findings
Canonical ensemble reproduces strange hadron ratios
Grand canonical ensemble under-predicts certain ratios
Transport models with high mass resonance decays fit the data
Abstract
We report the first multi-differential measurements of strange hadrons of , and yields as well as the ratios of and in Au+Au collisions at with the STAR experiment fixed target configuration at RHIC. The mesons and hyperons are measured through hadronic decay channels, and . Collision centrality and rapidity dependence of the transverse momentum spectra for these strange hadrons are presented. The yields and ratios are compared to thermal model and hadronic transport model predictions. At this collision energy, thermal model with grand canonical ensemble (GCE) under-predicts the and ratios while the result of canonical ensemble (CE) calculations reproduce , with the correlation length $r_c…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
