TL;DR
This paper introduces EBPR, a novel explainable and debiased pairwise ranking model for recommender systems that improves fairness and transparency while maintaining predictive accuracy on implicit feedback data.
Contribution
It proposes a new explainable loss function and an unbiased estimator for BPR, addressing both explainability and exposure bias in ranking models.
Findings
EBPR provides explainable recommendations with improved fairness.
The unbiased estimator reduces exposure bias against unpopular items.
Empirical results show competitive accuracy and fairness improvements.
Abstract
Recent work in recommender systems has emphasized the importance of fairness, with a particular interest in bias and transparency, in addition to predictive accuracy. In this paper, we focus on the state of the art pairwise ranking model, Bayesian Personalized Ranking (BPR), which has previously been found to outperform pointwise models in predictive accuracy, while also being able to handle implicit feedback. Specifically, we address two limitations of BPR: (1) BPR is a black box model that does not explain its outputs, thus limiting the user's trust in the recommendations, and the analyst's ability to scrutinize a model's outputs; and (2) BPR is vulnerable to exposure bias due to the data being Missing Not At Random (MNAR). This exposure bias usually translates into an unfairness against the least popular items because they risk being under-exposed by the recommender system. In this…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Code & Models
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
