Comment on "Do Gedankenexperiments compel quantization of gravity"
Andr\'e Gro{\ss}ardt

TL;DR
This paper argues that there is no definitive theoretical reason requiring gravity to be quantized, challenging claims that thought experiments compel such a conclusion.
Contribution
It critically examines recent arguments and demonstrates that the necessity of gravity quantization remains unproven and inconclusive.
Findings
No conclusive theoretical proof for gravity quantization
Recent paradox resolutions do not establish quantization necessity
Efforts to prove the necessity of quantization are inconclusive
Abstract
There is no conclusive theoretical argument that would require the quantization of the gravitational field. A paradox presented by Mari et al. [Sci. Rep. 6, 22777 (2016)] and its resolution by Belenchia et al. [Phys. Rev. D 98, 126009 (2018)] did not change anything about this assertion. Despite being interesting in other respects, efforts of a recent work by Ryding, Aurell, and Pikovski [arXiv:2107.07514] to further establish the inconclusiveness of the question of necessity of quantization are futile.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsQuantum Mechanics and Applications · Cosmology and Gravitation Theories · Paranormal Experiences and Beliefs
