The ghost of AI governance past, present and future: AI governance in the European Union
Charlotte Stix

TL;DR
This paper examines the European Union's comprehensive approach to AI governance, highlighting its efforts to promote ethical AI development, digital sovereignty, and regulatory frameworks as a distinct alternative to US and Chinese AI strategies.
Contribution
It provides an in-depth analysis of the EU's past, present, and future AI governance strategies, emphasizing its regulatory and infrastructural initiatives for trustworthy AI.
Findings
EU has a coherent approach to AI regulation and ethics
EU aims for digital sovereignty through regulation and infrastructure
EU's AI governance offers a third way beyond US and China
Abstract
The received wisdom is that artificial intelligence (AI) is a competition between the US and China. In this chapter, the author will examine how the European Union (EU) fits into that mix and what it can offer as a third way to govern AI. The chapter presents this by exploring the past, present and future of AI governance in the EU. Section 1 serves to explore and evidence the EUs coherent and comprehensive approach to AI governance. In short, the EU ensures and encourages ethical, trustworthy and reliable technological development. This will cover a range of key documents and policy tools that lead to the most crucial effort of the EU to date: to regulate AI. Section 2 maps the EUs drive towards digital sovereignty through the lens of regulation and infrastructure. This covers topics such as the trustworthiness of AI systems, cloud, compute and foreign direct investment. In Section 3,…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
