Breakdown of the Wiedemann-Franz law at the Lifshitz point of strained Sr$_2$RuO$_4$
Veronika C. Stangier, Erez Berg, J\"org Schmalian

TL;DR
This paper predicts a violation of the Wiedemann-Franz law in strained Sr$_2$RuO$_4$ near the Lifshitz point, due to distinct scattering processes affecting thermal and electrical resistivities, with specific temperature dependencies.
Contribution
It introduces a theoretical framework explaining the breakdown of the Wiedemann-Franz law at the Lifshitz point in Sr$_2$RuO$_4$, highlighting different mechanisms for charge and heat transport.
Findings
Thermal resistivity scales as T^{3/2} near the Lifshitz point.
Electrical resistivity follows a T^2 log(1/T) behavior.
Lorenz ratio deviates from the Wiedemann-Franz law with a T^{1/2} log(1/T) dependence.
Abstract
Strain tuning SrRuO through the Lifshitz point, where the Van Hove singularity of the electronic spectrum crosses the Fermi energy, is expected to cause a change in the temperature dependence of the electrical resistivity from its Fermi liquid behavior to , a behavior consistent with experiments by Barber et al. [Phys. Rev. Lett. 120, 076601 (2018)]. This expectation originates from the same multi-band scattering processes with large momentum transfer that were recently shown to account for the linear in resistivity of the strange metal SrRuO. In contrast, the thermal resistivity , where is the thermal conductivity, is governed by qualitatively distinct processes that involve a broad continuum of compressive modes, i.e. long wavelength density excitations in Van…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
