
TL;DR
This paper reviews the phenomenon where increased physical activity does not lead to higher daily energy expenditure, exploring potential mechanisms like mitochondrial efficiency and circadian BMR fluctuations to explain this energy compensation.
Contribution
It synthesizes existing research to highlight gaps in understanding of long-term energy compensation mechanisms in humans and animals, proposing new avenues for investigation.
Findings
Energy compensation can reach hundreds of calories in humans.
Long-term activity increases do not proportionally raise daily energy expenditure.
Potential mechanisms include mitochondrial efficiency and circadian BMR changes.
Abstract
The received wisdom on how activity affects energy expenditure is that the more activity is undertaken, the more calories will have been burned by the end of the day. Yet traditional hunter-gatherers, who lead physically hard lives, burn no more calories each day than western populations living in labour-saving environments. Indeed, there is now a wealth of data, both for humans and other animals, demonstrating that long-term lifestyle changes involving increases in exercise or other physical activities do not result in commensurate increases in daily energy expenditure (DEE). This is because humans and other animals exhibit a degree of energy compensation at the organismal level, ameliorating some of the increases in DEE that would occur from the increased activity by decreasing the energy expended on other biological processes. And energy compensation can be sizable, reaching many…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
