Phase delays in $\omega-2\omega$ above-threshold ionization
S. D. L\'opez, S. Donsa, S. Nagele, D. G. Arb\'o, J. Burgd\"orfer

TL;DR
This paper investigates phase and time delays in above-threshold ionization wavepackets using theoretical simulations, revealing deviations from common approximations and highlighting the influence of atomic potential range.
Contribution
It provides a detailed theoretical analysis of phase and time delays in strong-field ionization, comparing different models and emphasizing the role of potential range effects.
Findings
Significant deviations of ab-initio phase delays from strong-field approximation predictions.
Differences between short-range and Coulomb potentials in phase delay extraction.
Insights into the similarities and differences with one-photon ionization delays.
Abstract
Relative phases of atomic above-threshold ionization wavepackets have been investigated in a recent experiment [L. J. Zipp, A. Natan, and P. H. Bucksbaum, Optica \textbf{1}, 361-364 (2014)] exploiting interferences between different pathways in a weak probe field at half the frequency of the strong ionization pulse. In this work we theoretically explore the extraction of phase delays and time delays of attosecond wavepackets formed in strong-field ionization. We perform simulations solving the time-dependent Schr\"odinger equation and compare these results with the strong-field and Coulomb-Volkov approximations. In order to disentangle short- from long- ranged effects of the atomic potential we also perform simulations for atomic model potentials featuring a Yukawa-type short-range potential. We find significant deviations of the \textit{ab-initio} phase delays between different…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
