Post-Treatment Confounding in Causal Mediation Studies: A Cutting-Edge Problem and A Novel Solution via Sensitivity Analysis

TL;DR

This paper introduces a novel sensitivity analysis method for addressing post-treatment confounding in causal mediation studies, allowing for bounds on indirect and direct effects without extra assumptions.

Contribution

It develops a new weighting-based approach that incorporates post-treatment confounders into causal mediation analysis under sequential ignorability.

Findings

The method provides bounds for NIE and NDE over a range of plausible confounder correlations.

Simulation results show the approach's strengths and limitations.

Re-analysis of welfare data indicates initial results are sensitive to unmeasured confounding.

Abstract

In causal mediation studies that decompose an average treatment effect into a natural indirect effect (NIE) and a natural direct effect (NDE), examples of post-treatment confounding are abundant. Past research has generally considered it infeasible to adjust for a post-treatment confounder of the mediator-outcome relationship due to incomplete information: it is observed under the actual treatment condition while missing under the counterfactual treatment condition. This study proposes a new sensitivity analysis strategy for handling post-treatment confounding and incorporates it into weighting-based causal mediation analysis without making extra identification assumptions. Under the sequential ignorability of the treatment assignment and of the mediator, we obtain the conditional distribution of the post-treatment confounder under the counterfactual treatment as a function of not just pretreatment covariates but also its counterpart under the actual treatment. The sensitivity analysis then generates a bound for the NIE and that for the NDE over a plausible range of the conditional correlation between the post-treatment confounder under the actual and that under the counterfactual conditions. Implemented through either imputation or integration, the strategy is suitable for binary as well as continuous measures of post-treatment confounders. Simulation results demonstrate major strengths and potential limitations of this new solution. A re-analysis of the National Evaluation of Welfare-to-Work Strategies (NEWWS) Riverside data reveals that the initial analytic results are sensitive to omitted post-treatment confounding.