The ALPINE-ALMA [CII] survey: The contribution of major mergers to the galaxy mass assembly at z~5
M. Romano, P. Cassata, L. Morselli, G. C. Jones, M. Ginolfi, A., Zanella, M. B\'ethermin, P. Capak, A. Faisst, O. Le F\`evre, D. Schaerer, J., D. Silverman, L. Yan, S. Bardelli, M. Boquien, A. Cimatti, M., Dessauges-Zavadsky, A. Enia, S. Fujimoto, C. Gruppioni, N. P. Hathi

TL;DR
This study uses ALMA data to measure the fraction and rate of major galaxy mergers at z~5, revealing significant merging activity in the early Universe and its potential role in galaxy mass assembly.
Contribution
First use of morpho-kinematic [CII] data to estimate major merger fraction and rate at z~5, extending cosmic merger history understanding.
Findings
Merger fraction peaks at z~3 and decreases at higher redshifts.
Merger rate at z~5 ranges between 0.1 and 4.0 Gyr$^{-1}$ depending on assumptions.
Significant merging activity observed, but its impact on mass assembly depends on merger timescale.
Abstract
Galaxy mergers are thought to be one of the main mechanisms of the mass assembly of galaxies. Recently, many works have suggested a possible increase in the fraction of major mergers in the early Universe, reviving the debate on which processes (e.g., cold accretion, star formation, mergers) most contribute to the mass build-up of galaxies through cosmic time. To estimate the importance of major mergers in this context, we make use of the new data collected by the ALMA Large Program to INvestigate [CII] at Early times (ALPINE), which observed the [CII] 158 m emission line from a sample of 75 main-sequence star-forming galaxies at 4.4 < z < 5.9. We used, for the first time, the morpho-kinematic information provided by the [CII] emission to obtain the fraction of major mergers () at z~5. By adopting different prescriptions for the merger timescales (), we converted…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
