The Search for $\mu^+\to e^+ \gamma$ with 10$^{-14}$ Sensitivity: the Upgrade of the MEG Experiment
The MEG II Collaboration: Alessandro M. Baldini, Vladimir Baranov,, Michele Biasotti, Gianluigi Boca, Paolo W. Cattaneo, Gianluca Cavoto,, Fabrizio Cei, Marco Chiappini, Gianluigi Chiarello, Alessandro Corvaglia,, Federica Cuna, Giovanni dal Maso, Antonio de Bari

TL;DR
The paper discusses the upgrade of the MEG experiment to improve sensitivity in detecting the rare muon decay ${ m oldsymbol{ extmu}^+ ightarrow ext{f e}^+ oldsymbol{ extgamma}}$, aiming for a sensitivity of 6×10⁻¹⁴, enhancing the search for lepton flavor violation.
Contribution
This work presents the design, implementation, and commissioning status of the upgraded MEG II detector to achieve higher sensitivity in lepton flavor violation searches.
Findings
Successful upgrade of detector components for higher rate capability.
Improved resolutions in measurements while maintaining detector concept.
Preparation and commissioning of MEG II for future data collection.
Abstract
The MEG experiment took data at the Paul Scherrer Institute in the years 2009--2013 to test the violation of the lepton flavour conservation law, which originates from an accidental symmetry that the Standard Model of elementary particle physics has, and published the most stringent limit on the charged lepton flavour violating decay : BR() at 90% confidence level. The MEG detector has been upgraded in order to reach a sensitivity of . The basic principle of MEG II is to achieve the highest possible sensitivity using the full muon beam intensity at the Paul Scherrer Institute ( muons/s) with an upgraded detector. The main improvements are better rate capability of all sub-detectors and improved resolutions while keeping the same detector concept. In this…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
