Incentive Compatible Mechanism for Influential Agent Selection
Xiuzhen Zhang, Yao Zhang, Dengji Zhao

TL;DR
This paper introduces an incentive compatible mechanism for selecting influential agents in networks, ensuring truthful reporting and fairness, with provable bounds on the mechanism's effectiveness.
Contribution
It proposes the Geometric Mechanism for influence-based agent selection, ensuring incentive compatibility and fairness, and establishes an upper bound for such mechanisms.
Findings
The Geometric Mechanism achieves at least half of the optimal influence in expectation.
The mechanism guarantees incentive compatibility and fairness in agent selection.
An upper bound of 1/(1+ln 2) is proven for any incentive compatible and fair mechanism.
Abstract
Selecting the most influential agent in a network has huge practical value in applications. However, in many scenarios, the graph structure can only be known from agents' reports on their connections. In a self-interested setting, agents may strategically hide some connections to make themselves seem to be more important. In this paper, we study the incentive compatible (IC) selection mechanism to prevent such manipulations. Specifically, we model the progeny of an agent as her influence power, i.e., the number of nodes in the subgraph rooted at her. We then propose the Geometric Mechanism, which selects an agent with at least 1/2 of the optimal progeny in expectation under the properties of incentive compatibility and fairness. Fairness requires that two roots with the same contribution in two graphs are assigned the same probability. Furthermore, we prove an upper bound of 1/(1+\ln 2)…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsGame Theory and Applications · Complex Network Analysis Techniques · Game Theory and Voting Systems
