TL;DR
This paper introduces a spatial game model linked to disease dynamics to analyze how public behavior influences disease transmission, calibrated with Covid-19 data, revealing effects of interventions, wealth, and perception delays.
Contribution
It presents a novel spatial infection-reducing game model equivalent to a neural network, calibrated with real Covid-19 data to study behavioral impacts on disease spread.
Findings
Behavioral delays can cause oscillations in infection rates.
Government interventions significantly alter spatial behavior patterns.
Wealth influences individual compliance with health measures.
Abstract
One approach to understand people's efforts to reduce disease transmission, is to consider the effect of behaviour on case rates. In this paper we present a spatial infection-reducing game model of public behaviour, formally equivalent to a Hopfield neural network coupled to SIRS disease dynamics. Behavioural game parameters can be precisely calibrated to geographical time series of Covid-19 active case numbers, giving an implied spatial history of behaviour. This is used to investigate the effects of government intervention, quantify behaviour area by area, and measure the effect of wealth on behaviour. We also demonstrate how a delay in people's perception of risk levels can induce behavioural instability, and oscillations in infection rates.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Code & Models
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
