Improving the Power to Detect Indirect Effects in Mediation Analysis
John Kidd, Dan-Yu Lin

TL;DR
This paper introduces two new intersection-union test methods that improve the power to detect indirect effects in causal mediation analysis while maintaining proper error control, demonstrated through simulations and a proteomic study.
Contribution
The paper proposes novel intersection-union test methods that enhance power in mediation analysis, addressing limitations of existing tests.
Findings
Proposed methods outperform existing tests in simulation studies.
New tests maintain proper type I error control.
Application to proteomic data illustrates practical utility.
Abstract
Causal mediation analysis seeks to determine whether an independent variable affects a response variable directly or whether it does so indirectly, by way of a mediator. The existing statistical tests to determine the existence of an indirect effect are overly conservative or have inflated type I error. In this article, we propose two methods based on the principle of intersection-union tests that offer improvements in power while controlling the type I error. We demonstrate the advantages of the proposed methods through extensive simulation. Finally, we provide an application to a large proteomic study.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsStatistical Methods in Clinical Trials · Bioinformatics and Genomic Networks · Advanced Causal Inference Techniques
