Evaluating Effectiveness of Public Health Intervention Strategies for Mitigating COVID-19 Pandemic
Shanghong Xie, Wenbo Wang, Qinxia Wang, Yuanjia Wang, Donglin Zeng

TL;DR
This study evaluates the effectiveness of various COVID-19 public health interventions in the US using a novel causal inference method, revealing lockdowns significantly reduce transmission while reopening bars increases it, with disparities linked to demographic factors.
Contribution
Introduces a nested case-control design with propensity score weighting to estimate causal effects of interventions on COVID-19 transmission, accounting for disease dynamics and state-level factors.
Findings
Lockdowns significantly reduce COVID-19 transmission.
Reopening bars increases transmission risk.
Higher non-white population correlates with greater impact of reopening bars.
Abstract
Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic is an unprecedented global public health challenge. In the United States (US), state governments have implemented various non-pharmaceutical interventions (NPIs), such as physical distance closure (lockdown), stay-at-home order, mandatory facial mask in public in response to the rapid spread of COVID-19. To evaluate the effectiveness of these NPIs, we propose a nested case-control design with propensity score weighting under the quasi-experiment framework to estimate the average intervention effect on disease transmission across states. We further develop a method to test for factors that moderate intervention effect to assist precision public health intervention. Our method takes account of the underlying dynamics of disease transmission and balance state-level pre-intervention characteristics. We prove that our estimator provides causal…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
