A Cooperative Optimal Mining Model for Bitcoin
David Lajeunesse, Hugo D. Scolnik

TL;DR
This paper introduces a game-theoretic model for Bitcoin mining that aims to optimize profits and promote decentralization by analyzing strategic interactions between pools and miners in a two-stage Stackelberg game.
Contribution
It presents a novel two-stage Stackelberg game model for Bitcoin mining that captures the strategic decision-making of pools and miners, promoting stability and decentralization.
Findings
Unique and stable Nash equilibriums in the sub-games.
The model encourages a balanced distribution of mining power.
Potential to enhance Bitcoin network stability and decentralization.
Abstract
We analyze Bitcoin mining from the perspective of a game and propose an optimal mining model that maximizes profits of pools and miners. The model is a two-stage Stackelberg game in which each stage forms a sub-game. In stage I, pools are the leaders who assign a computing power to be consumed by miners. In stage II, miners decide of their power consumption and distribution. They find themselves in a social dilemma in which they must choose between mining in solo, therefore prioritizing their individual preferences, and participating in a pool for the collective interest. The model relies on a pool protocol based on a simulated game in which the miners compete for the reward won by the pool. The solutions for the stage I sub-game and the simulated protocol game are unique and stable Nash equilibriums while the stage II sub-game leads to a stable cooperative equilibrium only when miners…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
