Impact of the absorber coupling design for Transition Edge Sensor X-ray Calorimeters
M. de Wit, L. Gottardi, E. Taralli, K. Nagayoshi, M.L. Ridder, H., Akamatsu, M.P. Bruijn, R.W.M. Hoogeveen, J. van der Kuur, K. Ravensberg, D., Vaccaro, J-R. Gao, and J-W.A. den Herder

TL;DR
This study investigates how the design of absorber coupling in TES X-ray calorimeters affects noise, transition behavior, and overall performance, providing insights for optimizing TES design for space observatories.
Contribution
It experimentally analyzes the impact of coupling stem size and placement on TES noise and transition shape, revealing design considerations for improved performance.
Findings
Reducing stem-to-bilayer spacing decreases excess noise.
Coupling geometry influences the superconducting transition shape.
Stem diameter affects the smoothness of the TES transition.
Abstract
Transition Edge Sensors (TESs) are the selected technology for future spaceborne X-ray observatories, such as Athena, Lynx, and HUBS. These missions demand thousands of pixels to be operated simultaneously with high energy-resolving power. To reach these demanding requirements, every aspect of the TES design has to be optimized. Here we present the experimental results of tests on different devices where the coupling between the x-ray absorber and the TES sensor is varied. In particular, we look at the effects of the diameter of the coupling stems and the distance between the stems and the TES bilayer. Based on measurements of the AC complex impedance and noise, we observe a reduction in the excess noise as the spacing between the absorber stem and the bilayer is decreased. We identify the origin of this excess noise to be internal thermal fluctuation noise between the absorber stem and…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
