Detection loophole in quantum causality and its countermeasures
Zhu Cao

TL;DR
This paper investigates the detection efficiency needed to observe quantum causality violations, deriving new inequalities that lower the required detection thresholds compared to previous bounds, thus facilitating experimental tests.
Contribution
It introduces new classical and quantum causal inequalities with reduced detection efficiency requirements, advancing the feasibility of experimental quantum causality demonstrations.
Findings
Classical causal inequalities require over 95% detection efficiency for violation.
New inequalities reduce the detection efficiency requirement to around 92% for quantum correlations.
Quantum causal inequalities show lower detection thresholds than Bell inequalities, aiding experimental realization.
Abstract
Quantum causality violates classical intuitions of cause and effect and is a unique quantum feature different from other quantum phenomena such as entanglement and quantum nonlocality. In order to avoid the detection loophole in quantum causality, we initiate the study of the detection efficiency requirement for observing quantum causality. We first show that previous classical causal inequalities require detection efficiency at least 95.97% (89.44%) to show violation with quantum (nonsignaling) correlations. Next we derive a classical causal inequality I_{222} and show that it requires lower detection efficiency to be violated, 92.39% for quantum correlations and 81.65% for nonsignaling correlations, hence substantially reducing the requirement on detection. Then we extend this causal inequality to the case of multiple measurement settings and analyze the corresponding detection…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
