The 3.3 $\mu$m Infrared Emission Feature: Observational and Laboratory Constraints on Its Carrier
Alan T. Tokunaga (1), Lawrence S. Bernstein (2) ((1) University of, Hawaii, (2) Maine Molecular Sciences)

TL;DR
This study compares observational data of the 3.3 μm infrared emission feature with laboratory spectra of PAHs, revealing discrepancies that challenge the PAH hypothesis for the feature's carrier.
Contribution
It provides the first detailed comparison of observed IEF profiles with laboratory PAH spectra, constraining PAH sizes and highlighting inconsistencies.
Findings
Laboratory PAH spectra vary with temperature and size.
Extrapolation constrains PAH sizes to over 50 carbon atoms.
Discrepancies challenge the PAH carrier hypothesis.
Abstract
We examine the self-consistency of laboratory and observational data for potential carriers of the 3.3 m infrared emission feature (IEF), a member of the ubiquitous family of strong interstellar IEFs at 3.3, 3.4, 6.2, 7.7, 8.6, 11.2, and 12.7 m. Previous studies have shown that most Galactic sources (reflection nebulae, HII regions, and planetary nebulae) show 3.3 m IEFs displaying similar central wavelengths, full widths at half maximum, and profiles. Our study is focused on the band profile designated as Class A, the most prevalent of four classes of observed band profiles. In contrast to the observations, laboratory spectra for gas phase polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs), the widely assumed carriers of the IEFs, display central wavelength shifts, widths, and profiles that vary with temperature and PAH size. We present an extrapolation of the laboratory band…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
