Spacetime symmetries and the qubit Bloch ball: a physical derivation of finite dimensional quantum theory and the number of spatial dimensions
Dami\'an Pital\'ua-Garc\'ia

TL;DR
This paper derives finite-dimensional quantum theory and the three-dimensionality of space from spacetime symmetries and physical principles, highlighting a fundamental link between spacetime structure and quantum mechanics.
Contribution
It provides a physical derivation of quantum theory and the number of spatial dimensions based on spacetime symmetries and probabilistic frameworks, with no prior assumption of three spatial dimensions.
Findings
Number of spatial dimensions must be three for consistency with Poincaré invariance.
Reconstruction of the qubit Bloch ball within general probabilistic theories.
Establishment of a fundamental connection between spacetime symmetries and quantum theory.
Abstract
Quantum theory and relativity are the pillar theories on which our understanding of physics is based. Poincar\'e invariance is a fundamental physical principle stating that the experimental results must be the same in all inertial reference frames in Minkowski spacetime. It is a basic condition imposed on quantum theory in order to construct quantum field theories, hence, it plays a fundamental role in the standard model of particle physics too. As is well known, Minkowski spacetime follows from clear physical principles, like the relativity principle and the invariance of the speed of light. Here, we reproduce such a derivation, but leave the number of spatial dimensions as a free variable. Then, assuming that spacetime is Minkowski in dimensions and within the framework of general probabilistic theories, we reconstruct the qubit Bloch ball and finite dimensional quantum…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
